|
The Soapbox Rant an rave on the soapbox. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Why so many directory sites?
There really is only one live palace directory that processes live info.
I think its important newcomers should be told about this and how to sign up. I hope people who make new directory sites will include this info as well. Of course any new Palace site is good for the community as long as we make sure people can find all the info. If you don't link to the Palacetools directory your creating a problem. By breaking up the central place we have for finding servers your your taking away the only structure we have to find each other. Making more of the same instead of making what is there better is something you do for yourself, fine great! That is afterall why we go online and create our own piece of heaven. BUT you should also link up with the Palacetools directory.
__________________
~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~- Please don't ask me for help in private, use the USER QUESTIONS forum if you need help. ~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~- |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
I dunno what you really want by writing this but I think in a way your right. But lets not forget that for a group of people, probably people like you, the fun is making a website and not the social part.
The "community" as we knew it from the days Palace was something you had to pay for fell apart and turned into a giant ego-fest 4 years ago when then PDG group decided to screw each other. That is life I guess, Palace will never be anything more then some god-complex tool for people with no control over their real life situation. So what do you expect from these peopel? That they join you or actually contribute to someone elses site? I doubt that wil ever happen, its not why they entered this EGOd world. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Seems like Palacetools neither cares nor is interested enough in the community anymore to accept the offer. Ashame too, as we could have made a very sleek engine and a bunch of new features that the current cgi scripts don't have. Even the layout of the directory is bad, we could have really helped that out too. The sad part is... the entire site hasn't been updated in years it seems. I wish they'd allow people to help the site out... but they simply don't care anymore. Thats why other people are joining in I believe. When the central resource stops updating -- people stop going. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
All of the servers of palace connect to a central IP Address which PalaceTools.com owns. Their website layout is really all that needs updating, but that'll never happen as Jon says.
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
True, I definately agree and its sad to see so little happens when so many things are possible. My motto has always been: Never take control over a community resource unless your:
A: Willing and able to keep it up to date B: Ready to share it with others if they have a better idea That is why everything on Palacplanet is open for comment, input and ugrades or complete replacements. It is how I ran the few events I did run: Everybody gets the keys to the castle so they can do whatever they do at 100% without anyone deciding what is best for them. And you know what? These where the coolest most creative events I was ever part of, nobody was in control we all shared the responsebility. It was the end result that mattered. Sure it means you need to trust others but if you can't why be involved in community stuff right? But I also still believe that we should stick to the current live directory as long as there is no serious alternative. Websites with lists of servers are nice but spreading info across multiple directories splits up the community even more. Personally I think anything that upgrades or updates a Palace need is great but I also know from Palace Planet experience many volunteers join. Plans are made but less then 1 out of 40 actually contributes for more then a few weeks. So many walk away without a word it is hard to plan big projects because you never know who to rely on. Just look at how long it took to get a decent Palace compatible client: Almost 5 years and its still without Iptscrae. anyway...... |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Yeah, and look how many idiots donated money into Phalanx only to have a lemon produced? The damn thing eats up far too much RAM/CPU, mostly because VB is a layer executed above the normal program level like Java is. And look how slow Java runs in any OS, some better than others but, definately not the speed of C/C++ apps! And yes, it STILL doesn't support Iptscrae. Hell if I were one of the people who donated to BHLabs I'd ask for a refund PRONTO!
Don't give me any of that Palace32 uses 100% CPU bull... Palace32 only raises my load averages about 0.6 to 0.8 where as CrossOver Office (another commercial version of WINE) can barely run even the simplest of VB applications like a window that just sits there idle with no network activity HA! Plus VB isn't cross-platform - proprietary! Ideas and source code credits are NOT given their proper dues, which is mostly supportive of plagorism! I don't believe I saw 'Arad' in the credits for writing the code behind that toolbar Phalanx commonly used for so long! Oh yeah, some savior there! *vomits* |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Not sure about any of that VB stuff. I hate VB and anything that smells like VB is turned of on my PC. The only Palace client alternative I tried was Palacechat on Mac OSX and that worked pretty wel. It looks cool and the only thing missing is IptScrae and a way to position the log window :P
Might try the server on my Mac somewhere this week see whats up wiff dat. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
PalaceChat was coded in Real Basic, which by apperance maybe nothing more than another VB/Java/Python (software layer above the C/C++/ASM level). I might be wrong however... Real Basic might actually be compiled below and optimized more into the actual 'machine level'. You can't really say something that uses libraries either is bad news. Libraries are basically a really handy way to not have to include the same machine code into every program you write, for if that machine code is in 1 central place, it can be referred to time and time again. Libraries in central locations are a 'good' thing, and almost every piece of software worth using that interacts with the system on a big scale (networking/GUI/etc.), uses a library here or there. But it's when you stray further and further away from the hardware, and stack layer upon layer of code, until that top most layer is so far away from the CORE of the system that things really bogg down and suck. That's why VB/Java for sure, tend to perform so poorly regardless the OS you're on. As long as the application which you design has to be 'interpreted' by some other engine, instead of being on the machine code level that the CPU understands, your program is always going to have strikes against it! PERIOD! As a developer and scientist myself, I understand that there's good sides to interpreted languages, the ease of the language, perhaps it's closer to the native langauge you speak! As a developer though, you can't simply say 'one language' is better than another overall, VB is easier to a newbie yes, but as we all know, 'taking the easy way out' isn't always the best course of action no? Looking back now I would've traded my VB experiences without question for more time using C/C++.
I believe the human brain wasn't designed for 'easy steps'. I believe that our minds have 'evolved' into something so wonderfully complex, that a challenge is always good for those creative centers. For the more complex of a task you accomplish, is it not that much more self-estiem boosting? Self-estiem is infact a fine way to be motivated to learn, and I can understand where starting simple can boost people in those areas. There's ways a language can infact do more harm than good howerver. VB from a quick glance tries to teach you that a 'program' revolves around a 'GUI window'. Not really though... A program can be used to define life if you think about it. What is a program? A 'program' is an endless loop! A loop that is constantly trying to take on an objective, as long as the loop keeps going and going and going, it'll remain that way forever. Given that the program doesn't encounter an error along the way, much like the human body encounters break downs from age because cells don't reproduce as well as they did in previous generations. But this could simply be a direct by-product of something in our DNA programming althogether. And if a better program could be written to better renew the system as a whole as raw materials (food) are taken in, the system would in theory go on indefinately! Thus that loop is endless! And upon our death, that loop halts... Looking at life from a VB perspective - WTF DOES A GUI HAVE TO DO WITH LIFE?! What drives that GUI however, that's relative! |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Joe from AP runs PalacePlugins. He has only included 1 plugin of ours on the page after 2+ weeks of me harping on him to do it. In the end, he made an ultimatum that we had to upgrade one of our (unsupported plugins) so he could use it on his palace in trade for being linked. When you have to "barter" with someone to just get 1 of your products listed that's a bad sign. He say's it's so much work.. and I told him then he should give the domain to somebody else. He also said he will NOT give us the source code to plugall to continue development on it. We said fine, and now we're working on our own version of plugall (called plugit) that will include many of the features we think Plugall is lacking. Guess what? He's threatoned legal action (later pulled out though) and has said he won't link to it on his page no matter what. I feel really alienated by him, and also by Glide from the practice.chatserve.com page. Joe has talked to glide, and after that talk glide seems uncaring about our plugins too. It really makes you want to drop Palace, and leave the community altogether. When the two largest websites won't link to your products, which you've worked hard on without making a "deal" or "trade" or "bartering" it changes you. I've gained a very cynical view of the Palace community from these expieriences, and we often take long breaks in our projects now. Why? Why not? Not like we have a deadline when only smaller sites link to us. Palaceplanet is the largest website that links to our projects, and PalacePlanets a small tight knit community compared to Joe's or Glides. It's discusting when you think about it. I thought Joe and Glide wanted to help the community, but they seem to just like to squat over it and maintain a powerful position. Only let projects be "blessed" by them when they see fit. Very un community-like and goes a whole lot against the Free/Open Source Software spirit. I don't know much about glide, other than the communication I've had with glide through Joe. I haven't been able to ever get replies if I E-Mail him directly. Makes me feel like he doesn't even want to talk to me. NOT very community like! OH, that brings another quirk with joe, he hates how our plugins are open source, and says that is one of the reasons he doesn't link to us. I'm sorry, but us releasing the source to our plugins isn't negotiable. We believe in the spirit of everything being free and available for others. If we get hit by a train tomarrow -- we like the thought that someone else could pick our plugins/projects up where we left off. I'm sure you can understand our mentality. Joe and others can't though. Quote:
Quote:
I'd love to become a maintainer of the PalaceTools webpage. I think I could bring vitality and life to it. I have the time to keep it updated, and the expierience required. Janus has the skills needed to update the database and bring new features to the live directory. I wish more of the big-player sites were more open to letting anyone contribute, but they aren't, unfortunately. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|