Go Back   The Palace Avatar Chat Community Forums. > Palace Planet > The Soapbox
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Toplist Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

The Soapbox Rant an rave on the soapbox.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #21  
Old 06-22-2005, 09:17 AM
maarten's Avatar
maarten maarten is offline
forum die hard
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: DiGiLaNd
Posts: 975
Rep Power: 10
maarten is on a distinguished road
Send a message via ICQ to maarten Send a message via AIM to maarten Send a message via Yahoo to maarten
Quote:
Originally Posted by Janus
If it'll help Microsoft battle Linux, sure, whynot?
Oh I meant SCO got some MS support, but no big surprise there I guess.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 06-22-2005, 09:31 AM
maarten's Avatar
maarten maarten is offline
forum die hard
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: DiGiLaNd
Posts: 975
Rep Power: 10
maarten is on a distinguished road
Send a message via ICQ to maarten Send a message via AIM to maarten Send a message via Yahoo to maarten
When someone compares a 25mhz 68040 with a 2ghz G5 its a bit stupid to say thats only because it had a processor for everything. Yeah that really makes up for the missing 1975mhz... they where all hidden in those other chips...doh.... It was and still is FIVE TIMES more efficient with resources then anything else, and thats a software thing.

That is why the Amiga was used for 10 years after they stopped making them. I could throw super high-res pics around the screen as if it was nothing. It still runs all my animations smoothly, its a fun computer.

That is one thing you can not say about Linux, being five times more efficient.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jon_k
Quote:
Originally Posted by maarten
Hah I guess you never knew the concept of the Amiga:

Unix kernel with a super effecient graphical interface on top.

Multitasking like mad on 512K of memory, I got a Amiga 4000 here and it is still very fast and does things in real time a dual 2GHZ G5 can just about manage.
It's mostly cause amiga had a processor for each system.

Video had it's own processor
Sound has it's own processor
Keyboard Controller had its own processor
The central processor didn't have any petty HW I/O tasks to worry about -- it just worked with software.

You can imagine how this sped things up quite a bit. It costed more however, thats why everyones intigrating the shit. NIC's use to have a processor of their own to handle the TCP/IP stack, but like winmodems -- they're making it run by the central CPU. Cost is the reason.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 06-22-2005, 06:49 PM
Janus Janus is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Austin, Texas, USA
Posts: 139
Rep Power: 3
Janus is on a distinguished road
Send a message via ICQ to Janus Send a message via AIM to Janus Send a message via Yahoo to Janus
A lot of it does depend on the hardware. You can't get true color if the video card only supports 8-bit access. PCs haven't always had that capability, not as long as Amiga. So yeah, the hardware of the Amiga tops a PC by far, why not? You're paying a shit load more for it!

Linux on the other hand can compete with something like an Amiga, -BIG IF- the hardware of the PC can measure up with bitrate access. Perhaps you just have to explorer Linux more.

Any computer is limited by it's hardware. Amiga has had better hardware on the lower levels where access time and accessibility of the software counts. Don't knock Linux for not being able to out do the 'almighty Amiga' simply because the hardware driving the Operating System was lacking. PCs have and always will be the cheapest PoS on the market. Linux could match or out perform an Amiga better if Linux had the hardware to back it to a 'level playing field'.

I believe this argument is 100% founded on the basis of something like Microsoft's hidden APIs vs. a 3rd party application written with public APIs - not a level playing field!
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 06-22-2005, 06:51 PM
maarten's Avatar
maarten maarten is offline
forum die hard
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: DiGiLaNd
Posts: 975
Rep Power: 10
maarten is on a distinguished road
Send a message via ICQ to maarten Send a message via AIM to maarten Send a message via Yahoo to maarten
Damn you can talk some serious bullshit.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 06-23-2005, 10:03 AM
jon_k jon_k is offline
Member
 

Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 43
Rep Power: 0
jon_k is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by maarten
Damn you can talk some serious bullshit.
Microsoft is much better... [apologies, but I had to fit it in there]

I actually think they have accomplised porting Linux over to Amiga. Check it out: http://linux-apus.sourceforge.net/

Description: Linux/APUS is the project that allows you to run
Linux/PPC on PowerUP Amiga computer systems.

I almost wish I own an Amiga so I could actually try it out. I heard they were great machines; but to actually expierience it would be awesome.

Since your Amiga is almost a paperweight due to everything being old and outdated, maybe you could get that to run on your amiga box and try it out. That would be excellent if it works and runs fairly fast.

If you ever decide to undertake the project; I'd be delighted to see your results!

I'm not certain however, that it will run as fast as AMIGA OS; partly why it was so quick was because programs were small (they fit on floppies!) and since Linux has become bloated (albiet never as much as Microsoft -- Windows XP has 40,000,000 lines of source. -- Linux 4,287,449 lines of source) it won't run as fast as the True AMIGA OS.

It's sad really, how back then people coded OS's to be efficient as possible and small as possible because of limited processing power and memory. Now days since we have so much memory and processing power-- it's kind of like code as sloppy as you like.

Imagine how fast your system would go TODAY if they coded todays OS's/Programs with the same determination to keep it slim and efficient as they did in the past.

Anyways, if you do that Linux on amiga install; I'd like to hear about it :) [edit] It won't be as easy as installing RH linux though I'm afraid, closer inspection of the site says that you'll have to do your own bootstrapping and such. eeek.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2007, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.